What is it about?

Giving birth to a first child before 24 years age decreases the breast cancer (BC) risk by about half during the menopausal years. This decrease is due to breasts exposure to pregnancy hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). This hormone dramatically increases during first nine weeks of pregnancy, followed by rapid decline to low steady levels. The protective effect of hCG can be demonstrated in animal models, human breast cancer cells and in BCs grown in immunodeficient mice. These findings laid a foundation for hCG treatment helping to reduce the BC risk in young women, who are planning to delay their first childbirth into their late 20s and 30 years of age. In addition, hCG treatment can potentially induce BC remission in women who already have the disease.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

There are no current strategies to decrease the BC risk among increasing number of women across the world, that are waiting longer than ever to have their first child. It is now possible that this risk can be reduced by hCG treatment. However, this realization requires answering many questions, an investment of time and resources and initiation of multinational randomized placebo-controlled phase 1 clinical trials. It is a daunting task, but there are no alternatives. We owe this to an increasing population of young women in our societies, who are delaying the birth of their first child. There are many treatment options for women who already have the BC. They are surgery, chemo, radiation and hormonal therapies or their combination. Since BC is not one disease, multipronged treatment approach could lead to better outcomes. Here where hCG comes in. The study on human BCs implanted in immunodeficient mice, showed that hCG treatment causes their regression. It may be possible to combine hCG with the other therapies for even better outcomes.

Perspectives

hCG actions in breasts promote growth and development in preparation for ensuing lactation. The same actions before a prolonged and incessant estrogens stimulation of breasts in women who delay the birth of their first child, results in the protection against developing BC during the menopausal years. The question is, how do the hCG actions decades earlier can result in this protection. There are two possibilities: First is the hCG’s ability to induce the differentiation of epithelial cells to the state where they are no longer prone to carcinogenic stimulation. However, this is not a likely because another pregnancy hormone, human placental lactogen, can also promote the differentiation without providing the protection. Moreover, hCG induced differentiation is reversible, thereby the differentiated cells revert back to non-differentiated state by the time of menopause. This leads to the second possibility. hCG induces non-reversible signature genomic imprinting, gene expression changes and epigenetic modifications. Scientific evidence supports this possibility. For example, the genes that promote cancer development are down regulated and those involved in cancer inhibition are up regulated in breast cancer cells from menopausal women who had given birth to children as compared with menopausal women who never had children. Many details of these genetic changes have to be further investigated. It is time to begin exploring the protective effects of hCG through phase 1 clinical trials on women volunteers of 24 years of age or younger, who are planning to delay their first childbirth. The clinical trials require first determining the optimal hCG dose, treatment length and administration route. Women who already have BC or certain oncogene activations should be excluded, as there is evidence that hCG could promote the tumor growth. The wait time to assess the results will be long, but it is worth it. Moreover, we don’t have anything else to offer to these women. Another therapeutic possibility is treating primary and locally spread BCs by intra tumoral injection of hCG. Since not all the tumors will be responsive, the hCG/LH receptor presence must first be established in core needle biopsies. Only when they are receptor positive, then hCG can be administered to induce apoptosis/necrosis prior to surgical removal, as shown in xenografts. The BC incidence is lower in women who have gone through hCG diet for weight loss. This assertion should be further verified in age-stratified manner from the data from hCG weight loss clinics around the country. It is not advised to use hCG in known or suspected cases of certain oncogene activations such as ERBB2. However, it may be wise to explore whether hCG can be useful in BRACs mutations in improving the disease outcome, as breast epithelial cells differentiation induced by hCG can diminish the same cellular targets that the mutations might involve. Finally, hCG for the prevention/treatment of BC may not work for every one, as no strategy does. It is a lot of work, expense and time to conduct the clinical trials. But we owe this to women who are looking to decrease their BC chances or looking for alternative therapies that yield better outcomes, once they already have the disease. In addition, there are reasons for optimism for hCG treatment. So it is time to move forward testing hCG for the prevention and treatment of BC. hCG is cost effective and the cost can be further reduced by scaling up the production. The side effects will be minimal, if any. If they occur, they do not often require medical attention. Nevertheless, it is a small price to pay for a potential lifetime gain of benefits. hCG is a member of therapeutic glycoproteins such as, erythropoietin, interferons, monoclonal antibodies and tissue plasminogen activator, which are currently used in saving millions of lives from some of the most dreadful human diseases. hCG should be no different from them in view of its newly found therapeutic possibilities. hCG can be made much more effective than currently used preparations by glycoengineering. It is possible that glycoengineered hCG can be formulated for oral administration.

CV Rao
Florida International University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Protective Effects of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Against Breast Cancer: How Can We Use This Information to Prevent/Treat the Disease?, Reproductive Sciences, November 2016, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1933719116676396.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page