What is it about?

This corpus-based discourse study briefly reviews the activities of Boko Haram and the conflict between the nomadic herdsmen and sedentary agrarian farmers of north-central and southern Nigeria. But the study focuses on the representations of the main actors in the conflict and the conflict itself in the Western media and the Nigerian press and examines the ideological implications of these representations as well as the possible consequences of some particular evaluations of the conflicts for peace and security in Nigeria. The article’s findings show that the constructions of the conflict and the main actors in the Nigerian press are highly sensational, divisive, and dangerous. While the foreign press appears much more objective and often constructs the conflict as ‘deadlier than Boko Haram’, the reports still appear to minimize the seriousness of the conflict and construct the actions of the main actors from a perspective that would appeal only to foreign audiences.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Between January and June 2018, more than 1,300 people were killed in the farmer-herder conflicts, while the death toll from Boko Haram’s attacks was about 250. This is about six times higher than the number of people estimated by the UN to have been killed by Boko Haram during the same period. This little known conflict is far more dangerous than terrorism itself.

Perspectives

Unfortunately, the UN is doing very little or nothing at all about this. While this conflict is view is viewed as a mere national or regional concern, the impact is global whether we believe it or not.

Dr Innocent CHILUWA
Covenant University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: ‘Deadlier than Boko Haram’: Representations of the Nigerian herder–farmer conflict in the local and foreign press, Media War & Conflict, February 2020, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1750635220902490.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page