What is it about?

On Friday, 30 January 2015, Steven Blaney, Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, introduced Bill C-51, also known as the Anti-Terrorism Act in Canada’s House of Commons. This article delineates research into the media coverage of Bill C-51 in the month after its introduction, prior to its legislation. A qualitative content analysis of 23 articles from five Canadian news sources (National Post, The Globe and Mail, The Toronto Star, The Tyee, and rabble.ca) was conducted. Data were coded and analysed using the qualitative research software NVivo 10. Themes that arose from the data include: terrorism and our need for protection; production and reinforcement of fear; oversight, accountability, and abuses of power; and dystopic future and ‘big’ government. Findings show that the differences between alternative and commercial news sources were not as evident as much of the literature regarding the differences between the types of media would hypothesize.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Given ongoing discussions about terrorism, and continual issues with the ways that media discuss and cover "terror" this article is timely through explaining a strategic point in Canadian history through the media coverage of the "anti-terrorism act" of 2015.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: (Mis)representing terrorist threats: Media framing of Bill C-51, Media War & Conflict, May 2017, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1750635217702557.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page