What is it about?

In February 2011, the dramatic ouster of Hosni Mubarak threw into the spotlight the U.S. policy of granting generous and unconditional aid to the Egyptian regime at a time when the strategic rationale for such aid had become less obvious and calls for inserting human rights considerations into foreign aid allocations more prominent. Focusing on an unprecedented set of roll call votes taken in the U.S. House of Representatives during the years 2004 to 2007, this article offers the first quantitative assessment of the determinants of Congressional support for U.S. economic and military aid for Egypt. It challenges conventional wisdom on the limited role of campaign contributions in Congressional decision making by highlighting the central role of defense lobby contributions in maintaining the Congressional coalition that shielded Egypt’s pre-revolutionary regime from increased U.S. pressure in the years leading up to its eventual demise.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The findings shed light on the powerful economic interests which maintain Congressional support for the Egyptian regime even after the post-Arab Spring return to authoritarianism.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Guns, Butter, and Human Rights--The Congressional Politics of U.S. Aid to Egypt, American Politics Research, January 2012, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1532673x11433767.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page