How Japanese media covered 2011's Earthquake and Tsunami, and nuclear accident at Fukushima

What is it about?

It is based on average 3 hours of comprehensive interviews with newsroom executives who was responsible on their coverage from 14 mainstream news outlets, including, 5 national newspapers, 2 local and regional newspapers, 1 wire service and 6 broadcasting networks. Analysis were conducted by four Japanese journalism and risk communication specialists to find out problems for well-preparedness for another huge disaster, predicted 70% possibility in 30 years.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

It is the first comprehensive analysis on how Japanese media reported 2011's earthquake and tsunami, as well as nuclear meltdown at Fukushima Daiichi plant. The research revealed weak journalism, particularly watchdog function, of Japanese news media. Japanese media rather prepared well on dissemination of government information, such as seismic data and tsunami evacuation warnings. They, however, were not prepared for effective assessments on nuclear disaster for safety of people, for very few media had nuclear-specialized reporters. The research also found that those media still cling to their traditional platforms (print and TV) and not strongly interested in digital platforms even in the age of smartphones. Media were not also interested in collaboration though there were too much going on for media to report necessary information to readers and users, particularly during first several weeks after the breakout of the disaster.

Perspectives