What is it about?

The article describes self-identity work during transition from military to civilian life through two longitudinal cases study examples. It is suggested that by identifying the characters within the transitional stories narrated by the participants a better idea of what goes on in the self is gained during such processes. Moreover, that military cultures and civilian cultures tend to shape different, sometimes opposing, characters or I-positions of the self.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The topic of the article is relevant in order to (a) gain insights in how service members may experience self-identity work during transition (b) due to cultural differences between military and civilian worlds (c) to better prepare both service members prior to transition, and civilians, to understand that such differences may increase the capacity to make dialogue. The outcome of such knowledge could be improved psychological well-being in the midst of transition.

Perspectives

I perceive that issues, tensions and conflicts in the self are related to the lack of dialogue potentially fueled by cultural differences. A promising way to deal with such experiences is to increase the capacity to make dialogue between I-positions in the self and between self and others. As we start to let go of the fears in ourselves and of each other and aims for dialogue so much can be accomplished in the service of evolution.

Dr. Jan Grimell
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Advancing an understanding of selves in transition: I-positions as an analytical tool, Culture & Psychology, May 2017, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1354067x17707451.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page