What is it about?
Why are just war theorists so reluctant to use the language of winning and losing when discussing the ethics of war? This essay addresses this question. In doing so, it reveals the tragic dimensions of the idea of just war.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: No substitute for victory? Why just war theorists can’t win, European Journal of International Relations, July 2019, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1354066119864706.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
