What is it about?

The article outlines an integrated framework of status components and shows that stratified roles (such as leaders vs. followers, patrons vs. clients) constitute the most important status hierarchy in international politics. Stakes are higher in conflicts over status roles because such rank differences are starker and involve clear antagonists.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The new framework integrates various understandings of status and provides an explicit explanation why state leaders are so easily incensed by the way other governments treat their state. It thus challenges the view that status sensitive governments care most about national status markers and how other governments judge them.

Perspectives

I hope this article can enhance conceptual clarity and theoretical consistency in the dynamic field of international status research. In my view, it also provides a better link to recent status research in social psychology.

Reinhard Wolf
Goethe-Universitat Frankfurt am Main

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Taking interaction seriously: Asymmetrical roles and the behavioral foundations of status, European Journal of International Relations, April 2019, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1354066119837338.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page