What is it about?

This study was initiated based on the observation that standardized test for flatwise compression of foam materials, give significantly different test results for the measured moduli, and that these standards to date lack adequate instructions on how the strain should be measured and what specimen size should be used. A brief review of previous work shows that existing test methodologies provide significantly different results for the compressive moduli of foams depending on how the strains are measured. A thorough experimental study of the out-of-plane compressive properties is conducted on three different closed-cell foam materials, where strains measured with two different extensometer placements, and with digital image correlation, come out significantly differently. A parametric study is also performed showing that the results vary considerably with in-plane specimen dimensions, indicating effects of finite size and localized strain at edges. Both stochastic amorphous and homogenized finite element models of foam back the experimental observations by illustrating the effects of finite size and various boundary conditions on the measured properties.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The paper provides the correct test procedure for the determination of compressive modulus of structural foam materials using extensive experimental and numerical studies

Perspectives

PhD Student at KTH Stockholm Aerospace Engineer

Moeen Rajput
Kungliga Tekniska Hogskolan

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Compression of structural foam materials – Experimental and numerical assessment of test procedure and specimen size effects, Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, March 2017, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1099636217690500.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page