What is it about?
The evidentiary standard, beyond a reasonable doubt, is unamenable to the science of clinical diagnosis. Georgia is the only state to use this high standard. The high standard is particularly unamenable to a finding of intellectual disability when persons with intellectual disability defy the standards of the stereotype. This incongruence means that some persons with intellectual disability will not be protected from execution, as per the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Atkins v. Virginia (2002). As a result of its high standard of proof, Georgia unlawfully executed Warren Lee Hill in 2015.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The execution of persons with intellectual disability is unconstitutional. As well, given the historic maltreatment of persons with intellectual disability, this policy issue carries social justice implications.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Standard of Proof of Intellectual Disability in Georgia: The Execution of Warren Lee Hill, Journal of Disability Policy Studies, April 2016, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1044207316637546.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







