What is it about?

This research suggests a rational choice view in understanding conspiracy theorizing, and tests its argument on the uses of online conspiratorial accounts about the attempted assassination of Taiwanese President Chen Shui-bian. The findings show that people propose conspiracy theories rationally in line with their political arguments and perceived threats.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This is one of the few analyses of the communication of conspiracy theories on the Internet. Moreover, despite their apparent, and escalating significance, there are not many studies on the ways conspiracy theories are used in political debates.

Perspectives

I am pleased about this study in two main ways: (1) findings are very significant; (2) it is pioneering the relevant scholarship by focusing on the online communication of conspiracy theories.

Dr Turkay Salim Nefes
University of Oxford

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Rationale of conspiracy theorizing: Who shot the President Chen Shui-bian?, Rationality and Society, July 2014, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1043463113519069.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page