What is it about?

This article explains the peculiarities of institutional effects on growth rates in post-communist countries.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Legal institutional change in the post-communist world is a product of the quality of the political environment to a greater extent than their drift-phase alternatives.

Perspectives

Theoretical juxtapositions show that transition countries’ institutions built through path-breaking institutional reforms differ from those that emerge evolutionarily in the drift phase in a twofold manner in their relationship to growth. Growth rates of their economies are less likely to depend on the quality of legal institutions and are more likely to be a function of the maturity of political institutions.

Larysa Tamilina

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Post-communist Transition as a Path Break: Comparing Legal Institutional Effects on Economic Growth between Path-breaking and Path-drifting Institutional Reforms, Margin The Journal of Applied Economic Research, August 2017, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0973801017703513.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page