What is it about?

The assumption of racial differences in communication is socially and culturally embedded, and has been reflected in communication research for decades. Studies have revealed significant racial differences in trust in sources of risk communication messages. This study shows that race has been overvalued as an active agent in the risk communication process. It reveals that Blacks and Whites have similar levels of trust in mass media as risk communication sources. Socio-economic status was found to be a greater predictor of trust in those sources than was race. The study has positive implications for the design of effective risk messaging campaigns for populations at-risk from natural disasters.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

I believe this study marks something of a turning point in risk communication. For too long, the assumption of racial differences in communication have gone largely unchallenged, and have affected not only risk communication research, but the design of risk communication message campaigns. In a world where climate-related natural disasters are increasing in frequency and intensity, we need to make the most efficient use of scarce resources for those campaigns. I believe this study contributes to the achievement of that goal.

Perspectives

For me, communication research is about making a contribution that positively impacts people's lives. In risk communication, we have the opportunity to take that goal even further - we can actually help save lives by improving the effectiveness of risk messaging campaigns. It is my hope that this study contributes to that goal. We cannot bring back the hundreds of people who perished needlessly in Katrina. But through our efforts, perhaps we can save others from the same fate.

Dr. B.F. Battistoli
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Evaluating elements of trust: Race and class in risk communication in post-Katrina New Orleans, Public Understanding of Science, March 2015, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0963662515576865.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page