What is it about?
How collective bargaining shapes the management of restructuring in the banking sector in France, Luxembourg and Romania.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
In the corporatist or statist models of France and Luxembourg organized decentralization of collective bargaining helped sustain employment relations systems and cushion crisis effects. Bargaining outcomes included internal mobility and training. In Romania, by contrast, disorganized decentralization meant that solutions were left to the company level and to market forces.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The impact of crisis and restructuring on employment relations in banking: The cases of France, Luxembourg and Romania, European Journal of Industrial Relations, January 2018, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0959680117752047.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page