What is it about?

Reanalysis of two survey datasets reveals a curvilinear relationship between so-called "conspiracist ideation" and opinions about climate science. Our Commentary demonstrates that the original authors' analysis (which assumed a linear relationship) is flawed.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Structural equation modelling assumes linear relationships. It is vital to test this assumption. Our analysis gives an example where this assumption does not hold.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Conspiracist Ideation as a Predictor of Climate-Science Rejection, Psychological Science, March 2015, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0956797614566469.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page