What is it about?
Evaluation about how Industrial Associations are intermediating Open innovation and University-industry interaction in Brazil, in comparison with global benchmark associations, and diagnoses shortcomings in the Brazilian context.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The recent modifications to the Brazilian innovation law considered promising may encourage universities and research institutes to undertake intermediary-type tasks such as competitive intelligence studies. However, the innovation system and the market for ideas, knowledge and technology in this environment is not yet mature. There is a need for a proactive approach by the associations in conducting industrial and technological trend studies. There need to be more discussions with universities, but these discussions should not be considered simply as a cheap solution to update knowledge capacitation in accordance with the mindset of the ‘follower’. Rather, the global technological challenge needs to be the focus.
Perspectives
In the present Brazilian context, in which the promise of "emerging economy" and economic growth are reshaped as a kind of illusion, the Brazilian Innovation System requires revision to follow the learning process for adjustments. A simple copy of other countries systems or models would not suffice. We need to discuss its contextual issues… Significant has been the previous public spending/investments to make the Brazilian Industry competitive. However, how this concept of “competitiveness” was defined, or understood by the actors in this system? How these diversified and sometimes divergent understandings of the competitiveness results in the systems’ efficiency? The system is complex and, hence, needs, different perspectives of the analysis. In this paper we present a short contribution to this discussion, trying to capture the cultural aspects of the theoretically high-tech industrial segments in Brazil. They discuss a lot about innovation- how they consider “innovation”? How they are intending to deal with “innovation”? I hope this article promote further discussion about the efficiency of the innovation systems. The efficiency would be achieved just by a real integration and acknowledgement of all agents about their role in the learning cycle for system improvement. Those agents comprise not just politicians and public policy agents, but also professionals from the industry, researchers from both the industry and academia, industry representatives, managers, and every citizen.
Tomoe Gusberti
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Diagnosis of the market for ideas and the role of industrial associations as intermediaries in the Brazilian context, Industry and Higher Education, November 2017, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0950422217733087.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







