What is it about?
Because U.S. immigration officials are concerned that undesirable immigrants will use ‘fake’ marriages simply to acquire citizenship, they require that “green card” petitioning couples demonstrate that their relationships are genuine (i.e., for love) and not "fraudulent" (i.e., for immigration papers). However, the requirements are vague and appear to be gender- and racially-neutral. Men and women U.S. petitioner often seek advice from other successful petitioners online to learn how they can provide evidence that will satisfy the government requirements. I examine how petitioners use their understanding of gender, family, and sexuality to describe the government’s requirements for a “real” marriage worthy of a “green card” and how they define “red-flag” indicators of marriage fraud.
Photo by Jeremy Wong Weddings on Unsplash
Why is it important?
I argue that the petitioners on the forum are not merely providing advice but are actually policing their peers’ cases long before an immigration officer does. Although policymakers do not disclose what constitutes proof of genuine or fraudulent relationships, petitioners provide their own definitions based on their understandings of “real” families consist of white, middle class, male breadwinner and a female caregiver and sexual double standards surrounding men and women’s sexual agency, fertility, and attractiveness. These findings show that virtual spaces are consequential for contesting and upholding gendered, racialized, and classed citizenship and belonging.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Keeping it in “the family”: How Gender Norms Shape U.S. Marriage Migration Politics, Gender & Society, May 2018, SAGE Publications, DOI: 10.1177/0891243218777201.
You can read the full text:
The following have contributed to this page