What is it about?
This article examines the historical and theoretical journey of "beauty" in urban planning. It explores why aesthetics, which were once a central pillar of the profession, became marginalized over time in favor of more "rational" and functional approaches. By reviewing decades of planning literature, the study identifies the gaps in our current understanding and calls for a renewed professional discourse on the role of beauty in our cities.
Featured Image
Photo by Ananya Ganni on Unsplash
Why is it important?
In an era of rapid urbanization, planning often focuses on efficiency, transport, and infrastructure, leaving little room for the human need for aesthetic quality. This research is vital because it provides a solid theoretical foundation for planners and scholars who wish to argue that beauty is not just a "subjective luxury," but an essential component of social well-being and public space. It bridges the gap between past traditions and future challenges in urban design.
Perspectives
As an educator in design and architecture, I wanted to understand how we "lost" the language of beauty in our professional planning tools. My goal with this review was to remind the planning community that aesthetics are not an elite or superficial concern, but a core responsibility toward the public. I hope this work inspires a more holistic approach where beauty and functionality are seen as inseparable parts of a healthy city.
Asher Elbaz
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: What About Beauty in Planning Theory and Practice?, Journal of Planning Literature, August 2023, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/08854122231187574.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
