What is it about?
A randomised trial assessing the pain profile of two different varicose vein treatment types. The first to assess non-thermal non-tumescent ablation using MOCA versus RFA.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
First trial to assess the pain profile of Radiofrequency ablation and Clarivein ablation of the great or small saphenous veins
Perspectives
Interesting insight to the developing world of non-thermal non-tumescent treatments.
Mr Tristan R A Lane
Imperial College London
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing radiofrequency and mechanical occlusion chemically assisted ablation of varicose veins – Final results of the Venefit versus Clarivein for varicose veins trial, Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease, July 2016, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0268355516651026.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
