What is it about?

The paper explores whether the secrecy required by nuclear deterrence policy violates democratic values of transparency and accountability. It also asks how citizens should act in circumstances where political leaders might be required by policy constraints to lie about their own views on the use of nuclear weapons.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Politicians in countries that are nuclear powers, either coming into office, or with hopes of forming a government, are often asked their views on the maintenance of a nuclear deterrent. This paper helps us to understand some of the problems with contemporary public debate and treatment of politicians in these circumstances.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Democracy versus deterrence: Nuclear weapons and political integrity, Politics, October 2017, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0263395717733978.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page