What is it about?
Survey data on corruption are widely used to construct corruption indices, but the underlying data are hardly questioned. How do individual experiences shape perceptions of corruption? Do more work-engaged respondents perceive corruption as a bigger obstacle to business operations than others? What role does answer bias play in corruption surveys? This article brings together several strands of literature to discuss these questions and test them empirically with survey data from Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. We find that individuals who are more work engaged report corruption as a bigger obstacle. So did respondents who were previously exposed to corruption. We control for possible answer bias by implementing a randomized response technique, and find that corruption tends to be under-reported. The effects of work engagement and prior exposure on corruption are more pronounced when the bias indicator is considered, and again become stronger once we control for answer bias affecting past experiences with corruption.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Perceptions of Corruption: An Empirical Study Controlling for Survey Bias, Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, September 2017, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0260107917723787.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







