What is it about?

This analysis brings ‘‘aging with disability’’ into middle and older ages. We study U.S. adults ages 51þ and ages 65þ with persistent disability (physical, household management, personal care; physical limitations, instrumental activities of daily living [IADLs], activities of daily living [ADLs]), using Health and Retirement Study data. Two complementary approaches are used to identify persons with persistent disability, one based directly on observed data and the other on latent classes. Both approaches show that persistent disability is more common for persons ages 65þ than ages 51þ and more common for physical limitations than IADLs and ADLs. People with persistent disability have social and health disadvantages compared to people with other longitudinal experiences. The analysis integrates two research avenues, aging with disability and disability trajectories. It gives empirical heft to government efforts to make aging with disability an age-free (all ages) rather than age-targeted (children and youths) perspective.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

brings topic to all-ages perspective

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Aging With Disability for Midlife and Older Adults, Research on Aging, February 2017, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0164027516681051.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page