What is it about?

While federal policy makers have pursued “livable” communities since the late 1970s, they have rarely agreed on precisely what “livability” entailed and how best to achieve it. When U.S. Secretary of the Department of Transportation Ray LaHood promised in 2009 to make livability the hallmark of an ambitious interagency partnership with the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Environmental Protection Agency—and, in the process, to undo long-standing patterns of auto-dependency—it appeared that LaHood was poised to shift American transportation policy in a bold new direction. And yet other policies, such as those that govern the alignment of highway interchanges serving super-regional shopping malls, continued to promote the dominance of highway-driven economies.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This article demonstrates how the failure to confront historic development patterns fostered by the Interstate highway system undermined LaHood’s campaign for livable communities.

Perspectives

This essay provides an opportunity to reconsider the long-term legacy of the interstate highway system, and how it continues to structure economic and social choices, particularly in urban areas.

Dr Michael R Fein
Johnson and Wales University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Realignment, Journal of Urban History, May 2014, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0096144214533295.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page