What is it about?

Jihadist terror is a multidimensional challenge that compels unique difficulties on compatibility between the military campaign and the political goal. Compatibility between military campaigns and political goal requires a deeper understanding about the Jihadi terrorism phenomenon that could be achieved by a strategic and diagnostic learning process. Such learning requires certain characteristics, which enable the creation of open discourse. This article introduced definitions of closed and open discourse, characterized the required conditions for creating open discourse, and explained the linkage between strategic learning and open discourse. This article aims to add another theoretical layer to Rebecca Schiff’s “targeted partnership” concept by elaborating on the essence of the encounter and discourse between the political and the military echelons in the context of terrorism in the Middle East, using examples from the American and Israeli experience. The concepts of “Discourse Space” and “Diagnostic Learning” are corresponding with Schiff’s concept and accomplish it.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The article deals with one of the most challenging and disturbing phenomenon in the encounter between the political and military echelons in democratic states with regard to strategy making.

Perspectives

The article is based on findings, literature and personal experience in the highest levels of decision making with regard to military strategy and grand strategy.

Dr. kobi michael
Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) - Tel-Aviv University Israel

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: "Targeted Partnership" and Beyond: An Additional Theoretical Layer, Armed Forces & Society, April 2016, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0095327x16642042.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page