What is it about?

What does it mean to see someone as human, as a member of humankind? What kind of call for justice is it to demand that a group be seen as human beings? This article explores a fundamental kind of injustice: one of perception and how we respond to our perceptions. Drawing on Cavell, Wittgenstein and Rancière we elucidate “soul blindness” as a distinct and basic form of injustice. Rancière’s police orders and Cavell’s soul blindness are mutually constitutive; the undoing of police orders entails a politics of soul dawning. Soul dawning entails acknowledging the humanity of others without erasing difference. In the concluding section we consider white obliviousness to the Black Lives Matters (BLM) movement as a case of soul blindness. Part of the political import of BLM is its capacity to illustrate how practices of soul blindness in the U.S. constitute whiteness in a racialized police order.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The essay recovers the concept of soul blindness from the philosopher Stanley Cavell to analyse the political claims of the Black Lives Matter movement and to critique white liberal responses to the Black Lives Matter movement.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Soul-Blindness, Police Orders and Black Lives Matter, Political Theory, August 2016, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0090591716657857.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page