What is it about?
This issue of Urban Studies contains a full length paper authored by myself on how very variable trends are in African urbanization. That paper analyses the most recent census data from Cote d'Ivoire, Mali, Rwanda, Ghana and Botswana. It shows that some of the oft-cited and published analyses or statements about urbanization in the first four countries can be rather misleading. The journal issue also contains a paper authored by Fox and Bloch which analyses Nigerian urbanization and argues strongly against previous work published by myself which suggested that Nigerian urbanization was slower than had been assumed. This 'response' paper actually responds to a short article by Ivan Turok whose paper in the same issue reviews both of these other papers. My response picks up on some issues in the Fox and Bloch paper, in particular pointing out that their claim that I have argued that Nigerian urbanization had stopped ('stalled') was incorrect and that their analysis was using a revised Nigerian data-set from Africapolis (which provides urban data for African countries) which completely changes the picture of urbanization there as two large areas of the country with very high population densities are re-defined entirely as urban. My previous analysis had used an earlier Africapolis data-set which was published as 'final', which used Nigeria as an example of slowing urbanization in West Africa and did not define those areas as urban. Most of the differences between our analyses therefore rest on the different data available at the time the studies were undertaken, and the huge shift in definitional approaches taken by Africapolis. My analysis of Nigerian urbanization mainly focused on the country's main cities, however, and trends there are not affected by this issue.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
There is some tendency in literature on sub-Saharan African urbanization to assume a uniform and unilinear picture of very rapid urbanization across all the countries of the region. My research over decades has attempted to challenge this by showing how variable the processes of urbanization are, and have been, between different countries and over time. This 'response' paper is part of this continuing debate about what is actually happening and how important it is to engage with the available sub-Saharan urban data in a critical way.
Perspectives
Analysing urbanization trends is a difficult task. Different countries use different definitions and the impact on this on reported and published trends can be very large. Although many analysts of urban sub-Saharan Africa do note this it is too often only in passing with subsequent discussion using data from large urban data-sets such as the World Urbanization Prospects uncritically. This paper contributes to debates about these issues which are represented by four papers in this issue of Urban Studies: one by myself on Cote d'Ivoire, Mali, Ghana, Rwanda and Botswana; one by Fox and Bloch on Nigeria; one by Turok reviewing these two papers which take different positions on urbanization trends in sub-Saharan Africa; and a short response by myself to Turok's review.
Dr Deborah Potts
King's College
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Analysing African urban data: Refining the arguments and the (mis)understandings of end users: A response to Turok, Urban Studies, July 2017, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0042098017713576.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







