What is it about?
Ten coroner areas in England, with almost identical inquest numbers in 2011, were examined for patterns in their rates of reporting deaths to the coroner, rates of advancing reported deaths to inquest and comparative use of verdict types. Despite very similar caseloads, substantial area variation was found in reporting rates and in the rate of advancing reported deaths to inquest, consistently applied. Likewise, only two of the ten areas shared the same ranking of proportions in which the six common verdicts were reached. A similar caseload is no guarantee of a similar approach to reporting a death, advancing to inquest and choice of verdict.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
There are local differences in coroner investigation with no obvious evidential underpinning. Unless and until the variation can be attributed to either case-relevant factors not captured in the statistics or non case-relevant factors not routinely captured, the official process and outcomes consequent upon a death are vulnerable to the criticism that they represent a 'postcode lottery'.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Coroner consistency – The 10-jurisdiction, 10-year, postcode lottery?, Medicine Science and the Law, March 2014, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0025802414526711.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page