What is it about?
This article analyses the methodological quality of the Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis in Spine Surgery
Featured Image
Photo by Mathew Schwartz on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis are considered Level I Evidence in literature but without giving due importance to their quality the robustness of their results is in question and hence the study.
Perspectives
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis are considered Level I Evidence in literature but without giving due importance to their quality the robustness of their results is in question and hence the study.
Dr Sathish Muthu
Government Hospital, Velayuthampalayam, Karur, TN, India.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis in Spine Surgery—How Good Are They in Methodological Quality? A Systematic Review, Global Spine Journal, February 2020, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/2192568220906810.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
