What is it about?
This paper intended to link Bourdieu's sociology and the Theory of Social Representations (TRS), and also intended to increase a view of what are social groups in actuality; also we discusses the relationship by social positions and social beliefs, specially social representations,
Featured Image
Why is it important?
All of human behaviors embodied by a symbolic dimension both in psychologic level than public spheres. However there is a gap in the integration by sociological theories and models of analysis in one hand, and psychological theories and models, in other hand. Our work steps for a new trend, bases in Social Representations Theory, aiming built a model of analysis that regards social practices (group, collective practices) , like symbolic acts in a symbolic field. Also published: LIMA, R. P. de C. & CAMPOS, P. H. F. ( 2015) Field and group: a conceptual approximation between Pierre Bourdieu and the social representation theory of Moscovici (DOI 10.1590/S1517-97022015011454) CAMPOS, P. H. F. & LIMA, R. P. de C. (2015) Capital Simbólico Y Representaciones Sociales: una aproximación para investigar el espacio escolar. LIMA, R. P. de C. & CAMPOS, P. H. F. ( 2015) Social classes, field, groups: contributions to thinking about the school's social role.
Perspectives
Our perspective is to examine the view of social reality (or social space) both in Pierre Bourdieu’s thinking and in Serge Moscovici’s social representation theory (SRT), starting from a discussion on Bourdieu’s notion of field and on the notion of group in SRT. In Bourdieu’s sociology, the field is organized by principles such as economic and cultural capital, assuming that struggles occur in the social space according to agents’ social positions, habitus, and cultural practices. In the social representation theory (SRT), groups orient themselves, in their communication, towards the field of an object that mobilizes them, assuming that there is equality in the relationships of members as they build consensual, common sense knowledge about this object. The Bourdieusian sociologist can also make a description of the social practices in this group, rather than describing only practices referring to a single object. However, Bourdieu does not seem to focus on the study of groups. On the other hand, social representation researchers could be criticized for not always giving enough importance to the foundation of material objects. Both authors have in common the fact of privileging the symbolic dimension in the construction of social reality. We retake their common challenge of overcoming the subjectivity-objectivity dichotomy in the individual-society relationship. By means of such conceptual approximation, the article aims to build a psychosocial view of social dynamics between groups and social change.
PhD Pedro Humberto Campos
Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Goias
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Social positions and groups: New approximations between Pierre Bourdieus sociology and social representation theory, Culture & Psychology, July 2016, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1354067x16652133.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page