Rethinking 'voice' in research with youth who have little or no speech
What is it about?
Normative assumptions about 'voice' deem some kinds of interview talk more valid than others. The methodology described in this paper draws on Bakhtin's dialogism to problematize dominant understandings of voice, authenticity and the autonomous research participant. Case examples illustrate how the methodology was developed and implemented in research with disabled youth who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC).
Why is it important?
Positivist framings of research interviews risk systematically excluding people who communicate in ways other than speech. Our dialogical approach contests normative assumptions about what makes a good interview and who is the ideal interview subject. The methodology has implications, not only in relation to communication difference, but also in research more broadly.
The following have contributed to this page: Dr Gail Teachman