What is it about?

During surgery under general anesthesia, a better tool (index) than hemodynamics including blood pressure or heart rate has been needed and developed. Of the new tools, the parameters derived from finger photoplethysmography appear to be suitable for monitoring autonomic nervous system activation. Among them, clinical application of the SPI has been more frequently reported than other devices. However, previous studies comparing surgical pleth index (SPI)-guided and conventional analgesia using hemodynamics have shown somewhat differing results. This article is a meta-analysis review article about the SPI.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

SPI-guided analgesia appears to effectively provide adequate analgesia during general anesthesia based on several studies that have shown a good response to the SPI following the administration of various opioids. However, the clinical application of SPI may have considerable limitations associated with the patient population, positioning, fluid balance, type of anesthesia, or concomitant use of cardiovascular drugs. Moreover, considering the differences in the reported intraoperative opioid requirement and the degree of postoperative pain between SPI-guided and conventional (standard clinical practice) analgesia as indicated by hemodynamic parameters, there is a need to investigate whether SPI-guided analgesia is more beneficial than conventional analgesia.

Perspectives

We suggest that the use of SPI guidance is more useful and practical than conventional analgesia for analgesic titration during surgery under general anesthesia in various clinical circumstances. This systematic review shows that SPI-guided analgesia can reduce intraoperative opioid consumption and shorten the extubation time when compared with conventional analgesia during surgery under general anesthesia and has no negative impact on the degree of postoperative pain and incidence of perioperative adverse events (J Int Med Res. 2018;46:4386-98). But further research needs to be performed considering the small number of the included studies, and future systematic reviews should aim to reduce the heterogeneity of the outcome data. In addition, I have another important viewpoint on the SPI. For the measurement of pulse oximetry, the pulse photoplethysmographic amplitude (PPGA) depends on vascular wall distensibility and intravascular pulse pressure, and the greater PPGA is, the better the perfusion is. I demonstrated that since children have a lower vascular tone and higher vascular distensibility compared to adults, they are less likely to show prominent decreases in PPGA from sympathetic stimulation, leading to an underestimation of the surgical pleth index (SPI) during surgery (SPI is an analgesic index tool using the PPGA and heart beat interval [HBI] from pulse oximetry measurements and SPI is calculated using the following equation: SPI = 100 – [0.33 × HBI + 0.67 × PPGA].) and concluded that the SPI value is less likely to reflect the nociception-antinociception balance accurately in children because of their unique cardiovascular structure and physiology and thus, we should use a lower SPI target range than that in adults to more properly assess the degree of pain in children during general anesthesia (Anesthesiology. 2015;122:1280-7). A recent study supported the results of my study by reporting that a lower target (less than 40) than previously published target (50) for SPI may be more appropriate in studies investigating SPI guided anesthesia in children (Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:979-83). Therefore, I am going to focus on identifying appropriate SPI target ranges, and developing new indicators that objectively assess the degree of pain in children in the near future.

Prof. Byung Gun Lim
Korea University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Usefulness of surgical pleth index-guided analgesia during general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Journal of International Medical Research, September 2018, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0300060518796749.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page