What is it about?
Among firms that receive rating downgrades, those once placed on raters' watch list significantly outperform those that are not. The study presents evidence that a credit watch placement is not only an early warning of a possible rating downgrade but also informative about a bond issuer's ability to recover from credit deterioration. Compared with firms that are directly downgraded, firms receiving watch-preceded downgrades show better improvements in operating profitability, financial leverage, and overall default risk, long-term stock performance, and are less likely to be further downgraded in future periods.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The study suggests that credit watch placement can be related to remediation of credit deterioration. It shows that the perform implications can be economically significant. A zero-investment portfolio that is long on downgraded firms preceded by watch placements and short on direct-downgrade firms shows a monthly alpha of 0.7-1%.
Perspectives
It would be interesting to see whether a profitable trading strategy can be developed based on the finding of this study.
Alfred Zhu Liu
University at Albany, SUNY
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Revisiting Post-Downgrade Stock Underperformance: The Impact of Credit Watch Placements on Downgraded Firms' Long-Term Recovery, Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance, August 2015, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0148558x15598448.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page