What is it about?
In light of the extant diachronically correct Aramaic evidence, the phrase's non-titular use at the time of Jesus remains unproven. Meanwhile, the Book of Parables (1 Enoch 37-71, ca 1 CE) strongly suggests a titular use already in pre-Christian times.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Background of the Term ‘Son of Man’ in Light of Recent Research, The Expository Times, May 2019, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0014524619846374.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
