What is it about?
Speaking of treachery, it is fair to point out that, in fake African democracies, – where the people supposed to hold power are impoverished – no African president is such without treachery. The proclaimed president has the duty or obligation to betray his people to hold such a position as president of the republic, and for colonial purposes. We would like to address our concerns about treachery by agreeing with the idea that any African president who does not dare to betray his people has no right to preside over such a country. Such a hypothesis underlines an Afrodemocratic argument which maintains that the African country, as such, does not exist, and that the republic, in its much-mentioned sovereignty, is a lie. Treachery is an imperialist desire. It is real, and without denying it, for example, the insecurity in Nigeria, the conflict in the East of the Democratic Republic of Congo, the positioning of more than 9,000 men - or mercenaries - of Rwandan origin in the town of Madingou, in the South of the Republic of Congo to seat the son of Sassou-Nguesso, the named Denis Christel Sassou-Nguesso by force at the dawn of 2026 and/or to intervene in Kinshasa against the government of DR Congo, the presence of Rwandan troops in Mozambique, the Rwandan presence in key positions of critical administration in the Republic of Benin, the imprisonments of political opponents in black Africa all pass by the presidency, and are all works of political treachery of which the black president is the face. There is reason, according to the principles of Afrodemocracy, to close the presidency, and I insist on it.
Featured Image
Photo by Kenny Eliason on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Its importance lies in various arguments that demonstrate how deeply entrenched treachery is in hierarchies of power. This research highlights the seriousness of the crisis within African countries and constitutes material proof that the republic is a lie, and that the African country as such never belonged to the local populations. We therefore consider it noble to address such debates, to reframe such controversies around political personalities, in order to give meaning to the reason of African youth to choose a true socio-cultural identity which should guide African policy against colonial infiltration and corruption. We stand hereby against the systematic marginalisation of Africans.
Perspectives
By addressing the challenges we face; by fighting against the colonial systems of occupation, infiltration, corruption and impoverishment in Africa, I ideologically purify the thoughts of African youth beyond the simple knowledge of what has been politically hidden and finally revealed. To this end, I also advance the reason of young Africans beyond the simple political criticism of African intellectuals and activists, criticism against African governments, by proposing lasting solutions against Western colonialist imperialism. I wouldn't ideally want the children of today's youth to lead the fight that only today's youth must lead. To this end, I quote: “it is by desiring a radiant and free future for future African generations that critical and anticolonial thoughts like these, that theories of tribalism like these, that the hypothesis on Afrodemocracy as such, are conceived by my noble anticolonial mind as an over-aware black man".
Gael Clavis Johnson
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Theory Pre-Concepts 2, January 2025, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1163/9789004719002_003.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
