What is it about?
This paper focuses on an investigation of Sigmund Freud's drive theory that makes room for a critical function of utopia, understood not as a straightforward “fulfillment” of the drives, but rather as a possibility of their maturation, even in adverse socio-political and cultural conditions. In our view, the differentiation that ultimately produces the opposition between Eros and Thanatos in Freud is a site of philosophical reflection not only on the problematic function of the death-drive, but also on the – socially conditioned – possibility of human life as such. Consequently, the ambivalences and tensions found within Freud’s shifting articulations of the drive theory provide resources for rethinking human sociality beyond the bounds of Freud’s own social and political pessimism.
Featured Image
Photo by Ali Shah Lakhani on Unsplash
Why is it important?
We offer a new reading of Sigmund Freud's theory of drives, reflecting on the psychoanalytic stakes of a process of human emancipation that is particularly relevant in dire times of social disconnection and political disorientation. We examine the relationship between the so called life-drives and death-drives, highlighting not only their opposition, but also the dialectical process they engage, that impacts human historicity natural transformation alike.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Beyond the Death-Drive: Psychoanalysis and Social Critique, November 2024, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1163/9789004713789_012.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







