What is it about?
A close contextual reading of twenty regulae iuris in title D. 50.17 of Justinian’s Digest reveals that they are not legal maxims, as they have long been held to be, but rather rhetorical devices the Roman jurists used to support their responsa, opinions. on thorny legal problems. Even a responsum by Scaevola, often viewed as the archetypal jurist and the alleged founder of Roman legal science, and the oldest surviving regula, the regula Catoniana, are in fact rhetorical arguments rather than normative rules
Featured Image
Why is it important?
It calls into question both the entrenched presumption that Roman law and rhetoric are two unrelated disciplines and the modern image of Roman law as a science. Sometimes these regulae contain arguments that do not logically fit the perceived system of Roman law or that are even entirely unrelated to law. They show how, when law failed, the Roman jurists turned to rhetoric to make a compelling case.
Perspectives
We firmly believe that a paradigm shift in Roman legal scholarship is long overdue. The role of rhetoric has been ignored for far too long and we hope that our passionate plea for a symbiotic view of law and rhetoric will help bring about a fuller, more balanced understanding of Roman law.
The regula as a rhetorical device in Roman law Olga Tellegen-Couperus
Tilburg University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Preliminary Material, November 2024, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1163/9789004711020_001.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
