What is it about?
In 1960, the Dutch journal of the Catholic Social-Ecclesial Institute (Kaski) Sociaal Kompas became Social Compass. This shift rounded off a period now considered as the heyday of Dutch sociology of religion. Ironically, in those years, Catholic sociologists in particular contested the legitimacy of taking religion as an object of sociological study. Each period in the history of sociology of religion appears to present a different face of it due to the interplay between the political field, the religious field, and the academic field – and the self-identification as sociologists of religion is not self-evident. After 1980, further secularization resulted in a subsequent decline of chairs in sociology of religion. As direct, competitive government funding of academic research gained traction, the social-scientific study of religion continues to be funded. In so far as politicians and religious professionals continue to be concerned about issues such as the rise of Islam and new spirituality, the call for the social-scientific study of religion remains. The identification of these researchers with sociology of religion as a specialty, however, is less self-evident. What makes a sociologist of religion?
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The article shows how the interplay between the political, religious and academic field produces different faces of the discipline in subsequent periods.
Perspectives
Surprisingly, in an area where social scientific perspectives on religion are far from absent, sociology of religion as a specialism does not seem to thrive. This reflects particular developments in politics, religion and the academia.
prof. dr. Kees de Groot
Tilburg University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Sociology of Religion in the Netherlands, January 2015, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/9789004297586_008.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







