What is it about?
Minority rights and accommodation systems address a multiplicity of societal problems. These justificatory lines of argument can work in a reinforcing tandem, but they may also be in a state of collision. The legislative process as well as the interpretative usages of such rights at the domestic and at the international level can reveal where the centre of gravity is in each contingent situation.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
International law and human rights provisions are not envisioned as a legal straightjacket for the domestic legal and political systems. By looking at the layers of justificatory and legitimating arguments we can better understand and reveal the functioning of international legal rules at the domestic level, possible contradictions, as well as the longitudinal variations of the justifications domestically as well as internationally. The dialectic between what is understood as 'national' and what is understood as 'international' is more readily available if we adopt less monodimensional view of systems of rights and rules.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Shifts in the Multiple Justifications of Minority Protection, January 2014, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/9789004276499_008.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page