What is it about?

The term ‘magic’ is problematic. ‘Magical’ texts use conventional signs, symbols, and language, such as persuasive analogy, speech-acts, and show-acts, to organize information. These conventional semiotic structures are also present in religious, medical, and philosophical examples. Two early Byzantine amulets demonstrate these structures.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Magic studies call for a change in the modern scholarly assumptions regarding structures of authority, which have until now shaped a typical understanding of late antiquity. Magic studies is interdisciplinary, and it encourages critique of modern assumptions regarding authority and of our intellectual colonization of times past. Future studies must evolve ways to integrate different disciplines more seamlessly.

Perspectives

Serious study of history and archeology speaks to the increase of popular interest in magic. My students enjoy these topics.

Jacquelyn Tuerk-Stonberg
Kean University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Magical Amulets, Magical Thinking, and Semiotics in Early Byzantium, Old World Journal of Ancient Africa and Eurasia, September 2021, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/26670755-01010004.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page