What is it about?

This article critically examines the practice of writing national security strategy by deconstructing Secure Together, New Zealand’s first ‘national security strategy.’ I use a double epistemological helix to argue that the strategy’s authors enact a permanent deferral of the co-operation and contestation needed to transform a governmentality of unease into more participatory forms of democratic security because they want to promote the doxa upon which their profession exists and their exalted status depends. I also suggest disciplinary IR should embrace the radical explanatory potential of a politico-cultural anthropology of security.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Deconstructing National Security Strategy as Professional Struggle, Political Anthropological Research on International Social Sciences (PARISS), January 2025, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1163/25903276-bja10062.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

Be the first to contribute to this page