What is it about?
This article compares the way Thomas Aquinas and Michel Henry arrive at God: Thomas by way of metaphysical reasoning about objective being, Henry by way of the conditions of subjective life. They begin from different places, but their arguments are formally very similar. And yet the differences in starting points translates into differences with respect to the question of whether and how God is knowable.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Two Ways to God in Thomas Aquinas and Michel Henry, Journal for Continental Philosophy of Religion, October 2021, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/25889613-bja10016.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







