What is it about?
The issue discussed here is centered upon several questions: why were grammatical rules derived from qirat shaz and archaic poetry accepted?; why linguistic evidence from Hadith al Nabawi was refuted?; and why did some of them abstain from drawing linguistic evidence from the Qur’an?
Featured Image
Photo by Trust "Tru" Katsande on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This study looks at a cross-section of the views of early grammarians to provide an analytical approach in discussing and clarifying different views and misconceptions around the issues
Perspectives
It is a remarkable attempt to regenerate the ideas.
Solehah Yaacob
International Islamic University Malaysia
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Counter Argumentation against the Theory of Discrediting Hadith as Linguistic Evidence while Accepting the Authenticity of Anomalous Qiraʾat and Unknown Poetry (أوهام نظرية رفض الاحتجاج بالأحاديث النبوية الصحيحة بقبول القراءات الشاذة والشعر المجهول في ..., Al-Bayan Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies, December 2016, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/22321969-12340040.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
