What is it about?

The article analyzes the increasing tension between equality in legal discourse and the moral argument of religious communities concerning same-sex relationships. Debate within the Anglican Church in New Zealand, Aotearoa, and Polynesia is used as an example. Drawing from this, the article argues scepticism over rights language has shaped the debate and precipitated tension. It looks at the rights sceptic argument and arguments raised in response.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The article contributes to an on-going conversation on the relationship between rights language and religious traditions. It examines recent tensions over same-sex relationship recognition. And, by looking at a particular group divided over the issue, it suggests reasons why disagreement is possible while still pursuing shared goals.

Perspectives

Macquarie University, Macquarie Law School, Sydney, Australia

Dr Joel Harrison
Macquarie University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Debating Rights and Same-Gender Relationships, Journal of Law Religion and State, June 2016, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/22124810-00402004.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page