What is it about?

This article explores ego-inflation in academia through Jung’s concept of unconscious identification and Nietzsche’s critique of institutions. With nearly three decades of experience, the author argues that institutional pressures foster grandiosity and intellectual posturing, often masking deeper academic insecurities. The article examines the contradictions in teaching Jungian psychology, which emphasizes self-awareness. Jung’s most detailed case on ego inflation was Nietzsche’s collapse. Revisiting this, the article argues Nietzsche was highly aware of ego inflation, particularly in universities that suppress creativity through conformity. It discusses his advocacy for spaces that transcend institutional constraints to foster authentic self-awareness. The author critiques how both therapeutic and academic settings often prioritize intellectual detachment over holistic engagement, despite aiming for psychological growth. Integrating Nietzsche’s call for lived philosophy with Jung’s shadow work, the article underscores the need for physical and intellectual spaces that resist institutional homogenisation and ground self-reflection in material reality.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Inflated Academic Egos and Therapeutic Spaces, International Journal of Jungian Studies, August 2025, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1163/19409060-bja10055.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

Be the first to contribute to this page