What is it about?

The issue of the necessity to bring those responsible for the commission of crimes under international law during the ongoing international armed conflict in Ukraine, i.e., the aggressive war of the Russian Federation against sovereign Ukraine, does not raise any principal questions or doubts on the side of the international community. It is the matter of an appropriate forum, or fora to do so that needs to be properly addressed. This piece looks at possible judicial venues for holding the main ringleader of the aggressive war, namely, the President of the Russian Federation, and his closest high-ranking officials personally accountable for core crimes as a matter of individual criminal responsibility. Prospects for three judicial mechanisms, either already existing or potential, are reviewed and brief reflections are offered as to the realistic scenarios for each of those mechanisms given the status quo and ongoing developments.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

For the first time, prospects for all judicial mechanisms to decide on accountability of those responsible for the aggressive war against Ukraine, either already existing or potential, are reviewed and brief reflections are offered as to the realistic scenarios for each of those mechanisms given the status quo and ongoing developments, in an academic article.

Perspectives

It was important for me that the piece addresses both advantages and disadvantages of possible judicial venues on the main topic and at the same time warns about / stresses the significance of avoiding the mistakes of the past when creating similar mechanisms.

Dr. Rustam Atadjanov
KIMEP University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Holding the Aggressor Accountable, Journal of International Peacekeeping, August 2022, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/18754112-25020006.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page