What is it about?

This study is a brief reflection upon the features of the Central Arctic Ocean Fisheries Agreement with regard to indigenous stakeholders, and the potential effects of their uncritical inclusion in the broad interpretive and compliance paradigm known as illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing. Rooting their study in Fineman's vulnerability theory, the authors formulate a normative pathway for the regulation of Arctic fisheries that explicitly integrates legal frameworks established for the protection of indigenous peoples and their rights.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The study promotes a nuanced, legally informed and inclusive understanding of the IUU fishing paradigm.

Perspectives

The study highlights the need to take into account interdependencies between fragile ecosystems and vulnerable human communities.

Mercedes Rosello

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: IUU Fishing as a Disputed Concept and Its Application to Vulnerable Groups: A Case Study on Arctic Fisheries, International Community Law Review, August 2020, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/18719732-12341438.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page