What is it about?
This article argues that, instead of the nature of the crime or its punishment, the underlying problem that needs oracular law in the account of the blasphemer in Lev 24:10-23 is the ambiguity of the criminal’s identity. This ambiguity is employed in the narrative as a literary device by which the redactor of the narrative introduces the universal applicability of the blasphemy law that includes both natives and foreigners. By so doing, the redactor of Lev 24 serves the Holiness Code’s theological agenda, namely, the extension of holiness to all inhabitants of the land since pollution of the land by any of its inhabitants may eventually cause the expulsion of the whole people from the land. To this end, the redactor rewrites the Covenant Code and frames it with the narrative of the mixed-pedigree blasphemer.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Curious Case of the Blasphemer: Ambiguity as Literary Device in Leviticus 24:10-23, Horizons in Biblical Theology, April 2019, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/18712207-12341385.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







