What is it about?
In the seventeenth century, the plague was viewed as a divine punishment. Resistance was futile, and in the eyes of a Nuremberg Protestant like Paulus Fürst, it was something only a Catholic could conceive. In his iconic Doctor Schnabel print, Fürst depicts a Roman doctor attempting to escape death through a ludicrous outfit, seeking to profit from the epidemic —like a scavenging raven. This does not mean that depictions of masked plague doctors are entirely fictional. However, we must recognize that they contain symbolic and satirical elements that are difficult to interpret today—especially when removed from their original context. The context of Doctor Schnabel, specifically, concerns the plague in Rome in 1656, with the symbolism addressing religious opposition.
Featured Image
Photo by Peter Kvetny on Unsplash
Why is it important?
In 17th-century popular prints, a doctor is seldom just a doctor. Instead of being a documentary witness to a common phenomenon, they comment on moral, political, or religious issues. Neglecting such meanings inevitably generates misunderstandings that continue to influence present-day perceptions of early modern ideas about diseases, how they spread, and how they are combated. Secondly, there is the aspect of overgeneralisation. While Paulus Fürst’s print explicitly mentions that it concerns a Roman doctor in the year 1656, it is often used to illustrate protective equipment across a much larger part of Europe and over a much broader time span. But Eskimos don’t wear sombreros.
Perspectives
In the subject of this article, areas come together that I have frequently engaged with: the iconography of seventeenth-century art and historical medical illustrations. Plague art has seen growing interest in recent decades, but the infamous Doctor Schnabel has somewhat lagged behind in this regard. With this article, I aim to fill that gap.
Herbert J. Mattie
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Raven and the Plague, Annali dell Istituto e Museo di storia della scienza di Firenze, April 2025, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1163/18253911-bja10152.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







