Making Military Interventions Obsolete: Crafting r2p’s Peaceful Future through Principled Negotiation Strategies

What is it about?

There is a growing literature about the international community's 'Responsibility to Protect' (R2P) vulnerable populations against mass atrocities, but more is needed to demonstrate the potential of principled negotiation strategies to improve the quality of R2P outcomes. Proponents of the R2P principle base their arguments on the primacy of protecting human life against mass atrocities. Opponents claim national state sovereignty and non-intervention norms must be upheld. This norm contestation often leads to a situation where R2P is either not implemented or military interventions are conducted as a last resort. From an ethical and human rights perspective, both extremes are suboptimal to prevent and reduce human suffering. This article argues that to avoid both extremes, more effective negotiation strategies are needed. An analytical framework is offered that can guide policymakers in their quest to protect human life with peaceful and humanitarian means focusing on prevention under already existing R2P mechanisms.

Featured Image