What is it about?

This article analyzes the Women’s Advisory Board to the UN Special Envoy for Syria, a unique mechanism designed to include women in peace processes. Has the WAB fulfilled its objective? Based on ethnographic material, primary and secondary sources, this article argues that the WAB fostered a sentiment of exclusion among some of its members and of the broader spectrum of Syrian women’s organizations. The article further suggests that the WAB failed to meaningfully include women in the Syria peace process. I locate the sources of these failures in the process by which WAB participants were selected and the ‘peacemaker’ identity that they were assigned. The article suggests that the limits associated with the process of selection and the substance of the women’s engagement are inherent to the way the UN frames and justifies women’s inclusion. The WAB, it concludes, should not be hastily replicated as a mechanism of women’s inclusion.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Seeking Inclusion, Breeding Exclusion? The UN’s WPS Agenda and the Syrian Peace Talks, International Negotiation, May 2023, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/15718069-bja10090.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page